In a recent case, the Labour Court addressed the complex issue of enforcing restraint of trade agreements, as exemplified in Planet Fitness Proprietary Limited v Deon Buirski [2022] (8 November 2022). This case underscored the critical importance of precision in contractual documentation and highlighted the need for employers to meticulously uphold the validity of their restraint undertakings.

Background:

Deon Buirski, formerly the regional sales manager at Planet Fitness, ascended to the position of national sales manager with accompanying restraint of trade undertakings. However, a subsequent dispute arose when Buirski, having been suspended and demoted following alleged engagements with a competitor, took up employment with Virgin Active.

Legal Proceedings:

Planet Fitness initiated urgent legal proceedings, seeking to enforce the terms of the restraint of trade agreement, contending that Buirski’s employment with Virgin Active contravened these terms.

Buirski’s Defense:

Buirski argued that Planet Fitness erroneously sought to enforce the initial restraint undertakings, asserting that these had been superseded by a later set of undertakings. Furthermore, he contended that Planet Fitness failed to present the correct restraint undertaking in its court documents.

Court’s Analysis:

The court focused on established principles from Magna Alloys Research (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Elis [1984], evaluating whether Planet Fitness could enforce the later restraint undertakings omitted from its court papers. It emphasized the necessity of a balanced consideration of the employer’s proprietary interests and the former employee’s right to employ his skills elsewhere.

The court found that, due to Buirski’s demotion and dismissal, he no longer had access to critical information, diminishing Planet Fitness’s claim of protectable proprietary interest. Additionally, the court highlighted the absence of the correct restraint undertaking in the court documents, emphasizing the employer’s obligation to present an accurate copy of the contract for enforcement.

Importance of the Case:

This case underscores the significance of restraint of trade agreements in safeguarding employers’ proprietary interests. However, it serves as a stark reminder that, given the constitutional implications of limiting employees’ rights, employers must meticulously execute and preserve legally sound contracts. The failure to adhere to these standards, as exemplified by Planet Fitness, may jeopardize the successful enforcement of such agreements.

Employers are encouraged to approach restraint of trade agreements with precision and diligence, recognizing the delicate balance between protecting proprietary interests and respecting employees’ rights. The Planet Fitness case highlights the need for meticulous contract drafting, accurate documentation, and a thorough understanding of legal obligations to ensure the effective enforcement of restraint of trade agreements.

For comprehensive guidance on CCMA / Bargaining Council / Labour Court / High Court proceedings, labour law, legal advice, and consultations, our team of experts is ready to assist. Contact Workplace Law Chambers to address your specific concerns and navigate the intricate landscape of dispute resolution.